[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cd6bd9c-8724-ccb5-f83d-6367dac465a7@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:18:56 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/probes: Mark expected switch fall-through
On 2/13/19 8:04 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:10:40 -0600
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c: In function ‘parse_probe_arg’:
>> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c:302:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> arg++; /* Skip '+', because kstrtol() rejects it. */
>> ~~~^~
>> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c:303:2: note: here
>> case '-':
>> ^~~~
>
> I also already applied this patch (still need to run through tests)
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114203039.16535-1-malat@debian.org
>
Oh, that's great. :)
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists