[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902132157060.1659@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:58:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] genirq/affinity: add new callback for caculating
set vectors
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Add a new callback of .calc_sets into 'struct irq_affinity' so that
> > driver can caculate set vectors after IRQ vector is allocated and
> > before spread IRQ vectors. Add 'priv' so that driver may retrieve
> > its private data via the 'struct irq_affinity'.
>
> s/caculate/calculate/
>
> I *think* "set vectors" here has something to do with an affinity
> cpumask? "Set vectors" doesn't seem like quite the right terminology.
See previous mail. Let's stay with 'interrupt sets' and get rid of the
vector naming completely.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists