[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190213125906.eae96c18fe585e060aaf0ef7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:59:06 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix ref bias in page_frag_alloc() for
1-byte allocs
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:41:57 +0100 Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> The basic idea behind ->pagecnt_bias is: If we pre-allocate the maximum
> number of references that we might need to create in the fastpath later,
> the bump-allocation fastpath only has to modify the non-atomic bias value
> that tracks the number of extra references we hold instead of the atomic
> refcount. The maximum number of allocations we can serve (under the
> assumption that no allocation is made with size 0) is nc->size, so that's
> the bias used.
>
> However, even when all memory in the allocation has been given away, a
> reference to the page is still held; and in the `offset < 0` slowpath, the
> page may be reused if everyone else has dropped their references.
> This means that the necessary number of references is actually
> `nc->size+1`.
>
> Luckily, from a quick grep, it looks like the only path that can call
> page_frag_alloc(fragsz=1) is TAP with the IFF_NAPI_FRAGS flag, which
> requires CAP_NET_ADMIN in the init namespace and is only intended to be
> used for kernel testing and fuzzing.
For the net-naive, what is TAP? It doesn't appear to mean
drivers/net/tap.c.
> To test for this issue, put a `WARN_ON(page_ref_count(page) == 0)` in the
> `offset < 0` path, below the virt_to_page() call, and then repeatedly call
> writev() on a TAP device with IFF_TAP|IFF_NO_PI|IFF_NAPI_FRAGS|IFF_NAPI,
> with a vector consisting of 15 elements containing 1 byte each.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4675,11 +4675,11 @@ void *page_frag_alloc(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
> /* Even if we own the page, we do not use atomic_set().
> * This would break get_page_unless_zero() users.
> */
> - page_ref_add(page, size - 1);
> + page_ref_add(page, size);
>
> /* reset page count bias and offset to start of new frag */
> nc->pfmemalloc = page_is_pfmemalloc(page);
> - nc->pagecnt_bias = size;
> + nc->pagecnt_bias = size + 1;
> nc->offset = size;
> }
>
> @@ -4695,10 +4695,10 @@ void *page_frag_alloc(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
> size = nc->size;
> #endif
> /* OK, page count is 0, we can safely set it */
> - set_page_count(page, size);
> + set_page_count(page, size + 1);
>
> /* reset page count bias and offset to start of new frag */
> - nc->pagecnt_bias = size;
> + nc->pagecnt_bias = size + 1;
> offset = size - fragsz;
> }
This is probably more a davem patch than a -mm one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists