[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQfru298ZbEDwEqj0+YRAYoAGhAVHEtSo3KBW1kKLputw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:19:44 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: mark expected switch fall-through
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> kernel/auditfilter.c: In function ‘audit_krule_to_data’:
> kernel/auditfilter.c:668:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (krule->pflags & AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {
> ^
> kernel/auditfilter.c:674:3: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Merged into audit/next, thanks.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists