[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efa3bc7f-8316-dd39-6ef6-8e8ea6189feb@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:54:41 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: mark expected switch fall-through
On 2/12/19 7:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> kernel/auditfilter.c: In function ‘audit_krule_to_data’:
>> kernel/auditfilter.c:668:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> if (krule->pflags & AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {
>> ^
>> kernel/auditfilter.c:674:3: note: here
>> default:
>> ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Merged into audit/next, thanks.
>
Thanks, Paul.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists