[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508211525.GE23375@embeddedor>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 16:15:25 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: mark expected switch fall-through
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:19:44PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >
> > This patch fixes the following warning:
> >
> > kernel/auditfilter.c: In function ‘audit_krule_to_data’:
> > kernel/auditfilter.c:668:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > if (krule->pflags & AUDIT_LOGINUID_LEGACY && !f->val) {
> > ^
> > kernel/auditfilter.c:674:3: note: here
> > default:
> > ^~~~~~~
> >
> > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> >
> > Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> > in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
> >
> > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Merged into audit/next, thanks.
>
Thanks, Paul.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists