[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjMYWJPF8wFF_7J7yy7KCdGd8mZChfQc5GzNDcfqA7UAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:20:00 +0200
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:56 PM Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Makes sense - e.g. I would like to have a process to make automation
> of the xfstests for proposed patches for stable for cifs.ko easier and
> part of the process (as we already do for cifs/smb3 related checkins
> to for-next ie linux next before sending to mainline for cifs.ko).
> Each filesystem has a different set of xfstests (and perhaps other
> mechanisms) to run so might be very specific to each file system, but
> would be helpful to discuss
>
Agreed.
Perhaps it is just a matter of communicating the stable tree workflow.
I currently only see notice emails from Greg about patches being queued
for stable.
I never saw an email from you or Greg saying, the branch "stable-xxx" is
in review. Please run your tests.
I have seen reports from LTP about stable kernels, so I know it is
being run regularly and I recently saw the set of xfstests configurations
that Sasha and Luis posted.
Is there any publicly available information about which tests are being run
on stable candidate branches?
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists