linux-kernel - Re: 5.0-rc kernel hangs on early boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190213115115.GA8928@yury-thinkpad>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:51:15 +0300
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: 5.0-rc kernel hangs on early boot

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:14:09AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:25:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > Hi Mel, all,
> > 
> > My kernel on qemu/arm64 setup hangs at early boot since v5.0-rc1.
> > Backtrace is not too verbose:
> > (gdb) i threads
> >   Id   Target Id         Frame
> > * 1    Thread 1 (CPU#0 [running]) 0xffff000010a49b74 in __delay (cycles=4096)
> >     at arch/arm64/lib/delay.c:49
> >   2    Thread 2 (CPU#1 [halted ]) 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >   3    Thread 3 (CPU#2 [halted ]) 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >   4    Thread 4 (CPU#3 [halted ]) 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0xffff000010a49b74 in __delay (cycles=4096) at arch/arm64/lib/delay.c:49
> > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> > 
> > Reverting the patch
> > 1c30844d2dfe272d58c ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external
> > fragmentation event occurs") together with following patch
> > 73444bc4d8f92e46a20 ("mm, page_alloc: do not wake kswapd with zone lock held")
> > helps me to boot normally. 
> > 
> 
> Well, that's a bad start to any day. Thanks for tracking it down. Does
> the following patch help? I can't test it properly as I didn't recreate
> your boot image or initrd but this appears to get past the initial boot
> phase at least.

Hi Mel,

The patch works for me. The day gets better indeed. :-)

Tested-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>

Yury

> ---8<---
> mm, page_alloc: Fix a division by zero error when boosting watermarks
> 
> Yury Norov reported that an arm64 KVM instance could not boot since after
> v5.0-rc1 and could addressed by reverting the patches
> 
> 1c30844d2dfe272d58c ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external
> 73444bc4d8f92e46a20 ("mm, page_alloc: do not wake kswapd with zone lock held")
> 
> The problem is that a division by zero error is possible if boosting occurs
> either very early in boot or if the high watermark is very small. This
> patch checks for the conditions and avoids boosting in those cases.
> 
> Fixes: 1c30844d2dfe ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs")
> Reported-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> 
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index d295c9bc01a8..ae7e4ba5b9f5 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2170,6 +2170,11 @@ static inline void boost_watermark(struct zone *zone)
>  
>  	max_boost = mult_frac(zone->_watermark[WMARK_HIGH],
>  			watermark_boost_factor, 10000);
> +
> +	/* high watermark be be uninitialised or very small */
> +	if (!max_boost)
> +		return;
> +
>  	max_boost = max(pageblock_nr_pages, max_boost);
>  
>  	zone->watermark_boost = min(zone->watermark_boost + pageblock_nr_pages,
>