[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b299217a-454d-6d3a-9c48-3500a95040a7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:13:32 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"mkarthik@...dia.com" <mkarthik@...dia.com>,
"smohammed@...dia.com" <smohammed@...dia.com>,
"talho@...dia.com" <talho@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V19 1/7] i2c: tegra: sort all the include headers
alphabetically
13.02.2019 11:35, Wolfram Sang пишет:
>
>>> "^ Header removal should be mentioned in the commit message, I think."
>>> - Wolfram Sang [0]
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/11/375
>>>
>>
>> It could make sense to adjust the comment only if there will be
>> anything else worthwhile a new revision, otherwise it is
>> not-so-important.
>
> Not quite. Addressing review comments and proper commit messages are
> both important. So, it needs to be fixed. Yes, I can fix this small
> issue locally here (and I will do this, so no need to resend), but this
> is ultimately my decision (which you can surely ask for but not
> rely on).
>
> I'll apply this series later today.
>
Fixing up minor itches while applying patches is the right approach, thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists