[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190214122027.c0df36282d65dc9979248117@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:20:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Samuel Dionne-Riel <samuel@...nne-riel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, graham@...hamc.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Userspace regression in LTS and stable kernels
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:56:46 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:37 PM Richard Weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Your shebang line exceeds BINPRM_BUF_SIZE.
> > Before the said commit the kernel silently truncated the shebang line
> > (and corrupted it),
> > now it tells the user that the line is too long.
>
> It doesn't matter if it "corrupted" things by truncating it. All that
> matters is "it used to work, now it doesn't"
>
> Yes, maybe it never *should* have worked. And yes, it's sad that
> people apparently had cases that depended on this odd behavior, but
> there we are.
>
> I see that Kees has a patch to fix it up.
>
Greg, I think we have a problem here.
8099b047ecc431518 ("exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang
string") wasn't marked for backporting. And, presumably as a
consequence, Kees's fix "exec: load_script: allow interpreter argument
truncation" was not marked for backporting.
8099b047ecc431518 hasn't even appeared in a Linus released kernel, yet
it is now present in 4.9.x, 4.14.x, 4.19.x and 4.20.x.
I don't know if Oleg considered backporting that patch. I certainly
did (I always do), and I decided against doing so. Yet there it is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists