[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190214202008.GA15525@embeddedor>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:20:08 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwanem@...il.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: sc1200: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c: In function ‘sc1200wdt_ioctl’:
drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c:241:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
sc1200wdt_write_data(WDTO, timeout);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c:244:2: note: here
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
index 8e4e2fc13f87..e035a4d4b299 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static long sc1200wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
return -EINVAL;
timeout = new_timeout;
sc1200wdt_write_data(WDTO, timeout);
- /* fall through and return the new timeout */
+ /* fall through - and return the new timeout */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(timeout * 60, p);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists