linux-kernel - Re: [v3] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:13:50 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Cc:     Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@...mail.com>,
        Xue Zhihong <xue.zhihong@....com.cn>,
        Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [v3] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing put_device()

>> +    when != ex = \( (T)id \| &id->dev \| get_device(&id->dev) \| (T1)platform_get_drvdata(id) \)
>
> There is no need for the disjunction.  There is also no need for the
> different variables.

Really?

Would you like to distinguish the shown assignment expressions anyhow?


> Different variables are only needed when the when conditions are on
> different ...s

I find that this information will need further clarification.
Will any additional adjustments become relevant for such SmPL when specifications?

Regards,
Markus