linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd09f00f-7174-4d06-50a2-3cc056b7d763@suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:03:14 +0100
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/28] x86/asm/entry: annotate THUNKs

On 12. 02. 19, 13:13, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:51:08PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> And what if the LOCAL macros prepend .L automatically? The references
>> would need to be via macro or by manually adding .L. I mean:
>>
>> SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(function)
>>   ret
>> SYM_CODE_END(function)
>>
>> And then used as:
>> call .Lfunction
>> or
>> call SYM_LOCAL(function)
>>
>> Is that too ugly?
> 
> I'd prefer SYM_LOCAL because not everyone is aware of the fact that the
> GNU toolchain makes .L-prepended symbols local.

The problem with local .L symbols is when debugging:
> Local symbols are defined and used within the assembler, but they are
> normally not saved in object files.  Thus, they are not visible when
> debugging.

Which means, when I have:
> .text
> 
> .globl _start
> _start:
>         call .Lbubak
> .type _start STT_FUNC
> .size _start, .-_start
> 
> .Lbubak:
>         movb $0, 0
> .type .Lbubak STT_FUNC
> .size .Lbubak, .-.Lbubak

and I run it:
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /tmp/asm/asm 
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0000000000401006 in ?? ()
> (gdb) where
> #0  0x0000000000401006 in ?? ()
> #1  0x0000000000401005 in _start ()
> (gdb) disass
> No function contains program counter for selected frame.
> (gdb) disass *0x0000000000401006
> No function contains specified address.
> (gdb) x/i $pc
> => 0x401006:    movb   $0x0,0x0
> (gdb) x/i 0x0000000000401006
> => 0x401006:    movb   $0x0,0x0

Which is quite impractical -- disass won't work, only explicit dump via
x. And the kernel unwinder would be no more clever. So when patching
entry like:
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -323,6 +323,18 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__switch_to_asm)
>         jmp     __switch_to
>  SYM_CODE_END(__switch_to_asm)
>  
> +#if 0
> +#define KILLER killer
> +#else
> +#define KILLER .Lkiller
> +#endif
> +
> +SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(KILLER)
> +       UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> +       movb $0, 0
> +       ret
> +SYM_CODE_END(KILLER)
> +
>  /*
>   * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
>   *
> @@ -332,6 +344,7 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__switch_to_asm)
>   */
>  SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork)
>         UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> +       call    KILLER
>         movq    %rax, %rdi
>         call    schedule_tail                   /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>  

first results in objtool complaints:
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: .entry.text+0x190: unsupported intra-function call
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: If this is a retpoline, please patch it in with alternatives and annotate it with ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE.

and also the crash is misleading:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000
> #PF error: [WRITE] 
> PGD 0 P4D 0 
> Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
...
> RIP: 0010:__switch_to_asm+0x70/0x80

opposing to classic symbol:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000
> #PF error: [WRITE] 
> PGD 0 P4D 0 
> Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
...> RIP: 0010:killer+0x0/0x10

(The killer was appended to the previous function by gas in the former
case.)

Therefore, I don't think using local .L labels outside of functions is a
good idea...

regards,
-- 
js
suse labs