linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 7/9] x86/alternative: Batch of patch operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190215122026.3642d5b7@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:20:26 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 7/9] x86/alternative: Batch of patch operations

On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:00:49 +0100
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 2/14/19 3:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:30 +0100
> > Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> >   
> >>> 	void *trampoline;    
> >>
> >> Well, it ain't a trampoline either. It is a "temporary location to go to while
> >> patching is going on".  
> > 
> > 	void *detour;
> >   
> 
> The comment on top of text_poke_bp() defines:
> 
> handler:    address to jump to when the temporary breakpoint is hit
> 
> so, how about tmp_jump_addr?
> 
> well, detour works as well :-)
> 
> thoughts?
> 
>

"detour" sounds cool.

-- Steve