[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23408225-1768-d01e-4fd6-24289ef673ae@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:00:49 +0100
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 7/9] x86/alternative: Batch of patch operations
On 2/14/19 3:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:30:30 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
>>> void *trampoline;
>>
>> Well, it ain't a trampoline either. It is a "temporary location to go to while
>> patching is going on".
>
> void *detour;
>
The comment on top of text_poke_bp() defines:
handler: address to jump to when the temporary breakpoint is hit
so, how about tmp_jump_addr?
well, detour works as well :-)
thoughts?
Thanks!
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists