[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20e89cb0-b7ab-d0d7-8630-29ff512a4ef0@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:46:04 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"ashok.raj@...el.com" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...el.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...el.com" <yi.y.sun@...el.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"tiwei.bie@...el.com" <tiwei.bie@...el.com>,
"xin.zeng@...el.com" <xin.zeng@...el.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device
On 14/02/2019 20:14, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> This patch series extends both IOMMU and vfio components to support
>> mdev device passing through when it could be isolated and protected
>> by the IOMMU units. The first part of this series (PATCH 1/09~6/09)
>> adds the interfaces and implementation of the multiple domains per
>> device. The second part (PATCH 7/09~9/09) adds the iommu device
>> attribute to each mdev, determines isolation type according to the
>> existence of an iommu device when attaching group in vfio type1 iommu
>> module, and attaches the domain to iommu aware mediated devices.
>>
>> References:
>> [1] https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-virtualization-technology-for-directed-io-architecture-specification
>> [2] https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-scalable-io-virtualization-technical-specification
>> [3] https://schd.ws/hosted_files/lc32018/00/LC3-SIOV-final.pdf
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Lu Baolu
>>
>> Change log:
>> v5->v6:
>
> This looks pretty reasonable with Jean-Philippe's nit fixups. Where do
> we go from here? I think we need an ack from Kirti since they have an
> interest here. Presumably this looks ok to the ARM folks.
Looks great from my point of view. I focused on patch 1 since I'm
planning to reuse iommu_dev_features for SVA. I don't have time to test
auxd and mdev on SMMUv3 at the moment but I had a better look and, if it
helps, for patches 1 and 7-9:
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
That said, are you planning to add back the mdev_get_iommu_domain()
function, in a separate patch? Because I think the parent driver still
needs a way to retrieve the PASID for an mdev?
Thanks,
Jean
> Do we have
> any consumers of this code yet? Theoretically I think a vfio-pci-like
> meta driver could be written as an mdev vendor driver with this support
> (restricted to type1 iommu use cases). Thanks,
>
> Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists