lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155025643198.115909.9355230466710329335@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:47:11 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] clk: Introduce get_parent_hw clk op

Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-11 08:09:00)
> On 1/28/2019 11:10 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> > +static int clk_init_parent(struct clk_core *core)
> > +{
> > +     core->parent = __clk_init_parent(core, true);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(core->parent))
> > +             return PTR_ERR(core->parent);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Populate core->parent if parent has already been clk_core_init'd. If
> > +      * parent has not yet been clk_core_init'd then place clk in the orphan
> > +      * list.  If clk doesn't have any parents then place it in the root
> > +      * clk list.
> > +      *
> > +      * Every time a new clk is clk_init'd then we walk the list of orphan
> > +      * clocks and re-parent any that are children of the clock currently
> > +      * being clk_init'd.
> > +      */
> > +     if (core->parent) {
> > +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node,
> > +                             &core->parent->children);
> > +             core->orphan = core->parent->orphan;
> > +     } else if (!core->num_parents) {
> > +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_root_list);
> > +             core->orphan = false;
> > +     } else {
> > +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
> 
> Missing "core->orphan = true;"?
> The snippet below had that line.  Its not clear why it appears to be 
> dropped here.
> 

Hmm. Weird. I think I may have been getting ahead of myself and moving
the orphan updating code into __clk_init_parent(). I can't remember why
though, so I guess I'll go all the way and move it all into
__clk_init_parent() now. Thanks for pointing it out.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ