[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iZHfU=mE3JGcKqbswGGert7CvpKPkVE1s+-X1zXKJiEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 22:36:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: set of_node in platform_device_register_full()
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 5:50 PM Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com> wrote:
>
> If the provided fwnode is an OF node, set dev.of_node as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index dff82a3c2caa..853a1d0e5845 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
>
> pdev->dev.parent = pdevinfo->parent;
> pdev->dev.fwnode = pdevinfo->fwnode;
> + pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(to_of_node(pdev->dev.fwnode));
of_node_get() generally does a kobject_get() on the node's kobject, so
when is that reference dropped? Or if it doesn't need to be dropped
at all, why is this the case?
>
> if (pdevinfo->dma_mask) {
> /*
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists