[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb073383-e4c2-f089-cdaa-a582ffc7fe79@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:02:29 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/drm_vm: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi Daniel,
On 2/18/19 2:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>
> Queued for 5.2, thanks for your patch.
> -Daniel
>
I wonder if you could take this one too, or give me some feedback
about it:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10646783/
I've pinged twice, but I haven't received any responses.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists