lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb073383-e4c2-f089-cdaa-a582ffc7fe79@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:02:29 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/drm_vm: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

Hi Daniel,

On 2/18/19 2:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> 
> Queued for 5.2, thanks for your patch.
> -Daniel
> 

I wonder if you could take this one too, or give me some feedback
about it:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10646783/

I've pinged twice, but I haven't received any responses.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ