[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEpH0hMUjNYDunFwkBDKUM41cdMyVBSS0Z3rg6txMJMog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:58:29 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/drm_vm: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:02 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 2/18/19 2:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:05:46AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> >> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >>
> >> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> >>
> >> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> >> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
> >>
> >> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> >> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> >
> > Queued for 5.2, thanks for your patch.
> > -Daniel
> >
>
> I wonder if you could take this one too, or give me some feedback
> about it:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10646783/
>
> I've pinged twice, but I haven't received any responses.
Dave? nouveau is kinda your thing, at least all the fallout :-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists