[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877edxt1f1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:08:18 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of __sw_hweight8()
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> writes:
> __sw_hweight8() is just internal implementation.
>
> Drivers should use the common API, hweight8().
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> This patch should go to x86 tree along with 2/2.
>
> Otherwise, all{yes,mod}config of x86 would be broken.
>
> This patch is trivial enough.
> I want ACK from the net/wireless maintainer
> so that this can go in via x86 tree.
Sounds good to me, feel free to push via the x86 tree.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists