| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <638c5b62-ac3e-21d3-4ac4-0fad0ef8d9e8@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:57:45 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de,
davem@...emloft.net, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Dave, I wonder if you can take this.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 2/14/19 3:37 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/19 2:11 AM, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 29/01/2019 at 19:06, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c:668:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c:875:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:422:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c:895:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c:953:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c: In function ‘pcan_usb_decode_error’:
>>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:422:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> if (n & PCAN_USB_ERROR_BUS_LIGHT) {
>>> ^
>>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c:428:2: note: here
>>> case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>>> ^~~~
>>>
>>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>>
>>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>>
>>> Notice that in some cases spelling mistakes were fixed.
>>> In other cases, the /* fall through */ comment is placed
>>> at the bottom of the case statement, which is what GCC
>>> is expecting to find.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 6 ++++--
>>
>> For this one:
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>
>
> Thanks, Nicolas.
>
> Dave:
>
> I wonder if you can take this patch.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
>>> drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
>>> index d98c69045b17..1718c20f9c99 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c
>>> @@ -902,7 +902,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
>>> CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
>>> CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
>>> }
>>> - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
>>> + /* fall through */
>>> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>>> /*
>>> * from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING
>>> * to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF
>>> @@ -951,7 +952,8 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev,
>>> netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Active\n");
>>> cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT;
>>> cf->data[2] = CAN_ERR_PROT_ACTIVE;
>>> - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
>>> + /* fall through */
>>> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>>> reg_idr = AT91_IRQ_ERRA | AT91_IRQ_WARN | AT91_IRQ_BOFF;
>>> reg_ier = AT91_IRQ_ERRP;
>>> break;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c b/drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c
>>> index c458d5fdc8d3..e4f4d65a76b4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/peak_canfd/peak_pciefd_main.c
>>> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static int pciefd_can_probe(struct pciefd_board *pciefd)
>>> pciefd_can_writereg(priv, CANFD_CLK_SEL_80MHZ,
>>> PCIEFD_REG_CAN_CLK_SEL);
>>>
>>> - /* fallthough */
>>> + /* fall through */
>>> case CANFD_CLK_SEL_80MHZ:
>>> priv->ucan.can.clock.freq = 80 * 1000 * 1000;
>>> break;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>>> index e90817608645..17257c73c302 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
>>> @@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mcp251x_can_ist(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> if (new_state >= CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING &&
>>> new_state <= CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF)
>>> priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
>>> - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
>>> + /* fall through */
>>> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>>> if (new_state >= CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE &&
>>> new_state <= CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF)
>>> priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c
>>> index 13238a72a338..eca785532b6b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb.c
>>> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int pcan_usb_decode_error(struct pcan_usb_msg_context *mc, u8 n,
>>> new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> - /* else: fall through */
>>> + /* fall through */
>>>
>>> case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
>>> if (n & PCAN_USB_ERROR_BUS_HEAVY) {
>>>
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists