[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190219163456.GB752@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:34:56 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, peterhuewe@....de,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tpm: change the return type of
calc_tpm2_event_size to size_t
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:15:47PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> > On 2019/2/19 16:59, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 03:26:18PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> > >> calc_tpm2_event_size return size of the event which type is
> > >> size_t, If it is an invalid event, returns 0. And all the
> > >> caller use a size_t variable to check the return value, so
> > >> no need to convert to the return value type to int.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > I don't see this patch make any value.
> >
> > calc_tpm2_event_size return size_t 'size' which derive from u32 'event_field->event_size',
> >
> > convert it to int may result in truncation.
>
> Two remarks:
>
> - Your real name is formatted incorrectly. It should be like "Yue Haibig"
> as shown in [1].
> - If there is no actual regression, this change is useless.
Clarity of the code is a laudible goal - not everything is about
fixing bugs or adding features.
It is much easier to write the code properly than to try and prove
that event_size can not exceed INT_MAX.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists