[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190219170516.GL15711@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:05:16 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/mach-omap2/display: fix possible object reference
leak
Hi,
Adding devicetree list, Julia, Rob and Tomi to Cc.
* Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn> [190212 23:11]:
> of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the struct device
> when it finds a match via get_device.When returning error we should
> call put_device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> index f86b72d..c6aa9ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int __init omapdss_init_of(void)
> r = of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
> if (r) {
> pr_err("Unable to populate DSS submodule devices\n");
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> return r;
> }
In general, if the device tree node is never used afterwards,
should this be just:
r = of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
of_node_put(dev_node);
if (r) {
...
}
If so, Julia might have a Coccinelle recpipe for it?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists