lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:26:08 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree

Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:25:22PM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:58:11 +0100
>
>> Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 08:02:01PM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:36:11 +0100
>>>
>>>> Would be good to have some robot checking "Fixes" sanity...
>>>
>>>I want to add a script to my trees that locally do it for me but the
>> 
>> When it is in tree, it's already late. The robot has to check
>> emails/patchwork.
>
>It's for me, on my computer, to abort things when I try to commit
>with a bad fixes tag or missing signoff.

Okay, but still, robot checking emails/patchwork would safe you some
overhead.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists