linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190220132413.GH32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:24:13 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        len.brown@...el.com, namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:46:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:00:01PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:

> > The code bases on the top of Len's multi-die/package support.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/18/1534

> what is based on? I'm getting conflicts when applying
> on tip or Arnaldo's perf/core