linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:46:19 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        len.brown@...el.com, namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Multi-die/package support

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:00:01PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Add Linux perf support for multi-die/package. The first product with
> multi-die is Xeon Cascade Lake-AP (CLX-AP).
> The code bases on the top of Len's multi-die/package support.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/18/1534
> 
> Patch 1-4: They are generic codes for previous platforms.
> Perf supports miscellaneous modules, e.g cstate, RAPL and uncore.
> Their counters have the same scope of effect (per package).
> But they maintain their own scope information independently.
> It's very useful to abstract several common topology related codes
> for these modules to reduce the code redundancy, especially when
> adding counters with new scope.
> 
> Patch 5-8: Support die scope counters on CLX-AP for uncore, RAPL
> and cstate.
> 
> Patch 9-10: Support per-die aggregation for perf stat and header.
> 
> Kan Liang (10):
>   perf/x86/intel: Introduce a concept "domain" as the scope of counters
>   perf/x86/intel/cstate: Apply "domain" for cstate
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Apply "domain" for uncore
>   perf/x86/intel/rapl: Apply "domain" for RAPL
>   perf/x86/intel/domain: Add new domain type for die
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support die scope counters on CLX-AP
>   perf/x86/intel/rapl: Support die scope counters on CLX-AP
>   perf/x86/intel/cstate: Support die scope counters on CLX-AP
>   perf header: Add die information in cpu topology
>   perf stat: Support per-die aggregation

hi,
what is based on? I'm getting conflicts when applying
on tip or Arnaldo's perf/core

thanks,
jirka

> 
>  arch/x86/events/Makefile                           |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/events/domain.c                           |  81 +++++
>  arch/x86/events/domain.h                           |  26 ++
>  arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c                     | 364 ++++++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c                       | 333 ++++++++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c                     | 247 +++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h                     |   9 +-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c               |   2 +-
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt             |  10 +
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf.data-file-format.txt |   9 +-
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c                          |  73 ++++-
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.c                           |  55 +++-
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.h                           |  10 +-
>  tools/perf/util/env.c                              |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/env.h                              |   3 +
>  tools/perf/util/header.c                           | 185 ++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/stat-display.c                     |  24 +-
>  tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c                      |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/stat.c                             |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/stat.h                             |   1 +
>  20 files changed, 1082 insertions(+), 355 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/events/domain.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/events/domain.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>