[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220111226.GG32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:12:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf/x86/intel: Introduce a concept "domain" as
the scope of counters
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:00:02PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> It's very useful to abstract several common topology related codes for
> these modules to reduce the code redundancy.
> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
So you add 100 lines, so we can remove lines when we start to use this.
Except all 3 follow up patches that employ this, all add more lines
still:
1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
1 file changed, 224 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists