linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] platform/chrome: Fix off-by-one error in wilco

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:09:06 -0700
From:   Nick Crews <ncrews@...omium.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform/chrome: Fix off-by-one error in wilco_ec/debugfs.c

Thanks Dan, noted.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:31 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:15:18PM -0700, Nick Crews wrote:
> > Fixing something after it's already in the tree was a new
> > process for me, so I tried to copy other people's examples. Please
> > let me know if there's anything else I should do something different
> > next time.
>
> I seldom mention how much I like Reported-by tags because it makes me
> seem needy...  Also in this case it doesn't matter because it's going to
> get folded into the original patch so it's going to be lost anyway.  But
> since you're asking process questions, the Reported-by cookie is nice.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>