linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 03/16] powerpc/mm/32s: rework mmu_mapin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a9022c58dbf98ca2fb7ab96222799a7f77e5bcd8.1550775950.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, j.neuschaefer@....net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/16] powerpc/mm/32s: rework mmu_mapin_ram()

This patch reworks mmu_mapin_ram() to be more generic and map as much
blocks as possible. It now supports blocks not starting at address 0.

It scans DBATs array to find free ones instead of forcing the use of
BAT2 and BAT3.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c
index b260ced065b4..5fc59b195fef 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c
@@ -73,39 +73,58 @@ unsigned long p_block_mapped(phys_addr_t pa)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int find_free_bat(void)
+{
+	int b;
+
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_601)) {
+		for (b = 0; b < 4; b++) {
+			struct ppc_bat *bat = BATS[b];
+
+			if (!(bat[0].batl & 0x40))
+				return b;
+		}
+	} else {
+		int n = mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_USE_HIGH_BATS) ? 8 : 4;
+
+		for (b = 0; b < n; b++) {
+			struct ppc_bat *bat = BATS[b];
+
+			if (!(bat[1].batu & 3))
+				return b;
+		}
+	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static unsigned int block_size(unsigned long base, unsigned long top)
+{
+	unsigned int max_size = (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_601) ? 8 : 256) << 20;
+	unsigned int base_shift = (fls(base) - 1) & 31;
+	unsigned int block_shift = (fls(top - base) - 1) & 31;
+
+	return min3(max_size, 1U << base_shift, 1U << block_shift);
+}
+
 unsigned long __init mmu_mapin_ram(unsigned long base, unsigned long top)
 {
-	unsigned long tot, bl, done;
-	unsigned long max_size = (256<<20);
+	int idx;
 
 	if (__map_without_bats) {
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "RAM mapped without BATs\n");
-		return 0;
+		return base;
 	}
 
-	/* Set up BAT2 and if necessary BAT3 to cover RAM. */
+	while ((idx = find_free_bat()) != -1 && base != top) {
+		unsigned int size = block_size(base, top);
 
-	/* Make sure we don't map a block larger than the
-	   smallest alignment of the physical address. */
-	tot = top;
-	for (bl = 128<<10; bl < max_size; bl <<= 1) {
-		if (bl * 2 > tot)
+		if (size < 128 << 10)
 			break;
+		setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_X);
+		base += size;
 	}
 
-	setbat(2, PAGE_OFFSET, 0, bl, PAGE_KERNEL_X);
-	done = (unsigned long)bat_addrs[2].limit - PAGE_OFFSET + 1;
-	if ((done < tot) && !bat_addrs[3].limit) {
-		/* use BAT3 to cover a bit more */
-		tot -= done;
-		for (bl = 128<<10; bl < max_size; bl <<= 1)
-			if (bl * 2 > tot)
-				break;
-		setbat(3, PAGE_OFFSET+done, done, bl, PAGE_KERNEL_X);
-		done = (unsigned long)bat_addrs[3].limit - PAGE_OFFSET + 1;
-	}
-
-	return done;
+	return base;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.13.3