linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:24:52 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
Cc:     Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
        Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Avoid a u32 overflow

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 2:19 AM Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The register (SLP_S0_RES) at offset slp_s0_offset is a 32 bit register.
> The pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step() could overflow the u32 value while
> returning it after adjusting the step. Thus change to u64, this is
> already accounted for in debugfs attribute (that wants to output a
> 64 bit value).
>

Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!

> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> index 22dbf115782e..f90f4dd25151 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> @@ -328,9 +328,9 @@ static inline void pmc_core_reg_write(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, int
>         writel(val, pmcdev->regbase + reg_offset);
>  }
>
> -static inline u32 pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(u32 value)
> +static inline u64 pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(u32 value)
>  {
> -       return value * SPT_PMC_SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_STEP;
> +       return (u64)value * SPT_PMC_SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_STEP;
>  }
>
>  static int pmc_core_dev_state_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> --
> 2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko