[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221150912.yytlcxxwv7qodaf3@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:09:12 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow..."
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: move i915_kick_out_vgacon to drm_fb_helper
> > +int drm_fb_helper_kick_out_vgacon(void);
> > +
>
> Don't you need a dummy version as well for this one, like how it's done
> for the other functions, to cover the case when DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION is
> not selected?
Good question.
I guess it makes sense to kick out vgacon even with CONFIG_FB=n.
But when integrating this into
drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers() as suggested by
Daniel this isn't going to fly ...
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists