[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221155134.GU2665@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:51:34 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow..."
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: move i915_kick_out_vgacon to drm_fb_helper
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:09:12PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > +int drm_fb_helper_kick_out_vgacon(void);
> > > +
> >
> > Don't you need a dummy version as well for this one, like how it's done
> > for the other functions, to cover the case when DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION is
> > not selected?
>
> Good question.
>
> I guess it makes sense to kick out vgacon even with CONFIG_FB=n.
>
> But when integrating this into
> drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers() as suggested by
> Daniel this isn't going to fly ...
We need to put it into both versions of that function, or pull that
function out of the #ifdef.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists