[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <155079878723.5157.12433171255092403676.stgit@devbox>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:26:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH selftests 0/2] Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
Hi,
Here are patches for making sure the ftracetest testcases
are checkbashisms clean.
This actually needs a patch from Juerg, "selftests/ftrace:
Make the coloring POSIX compliant" to complete the work.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190220161333.28109-1-juergh@canonical.com
(Note that this is still under development)
So as Juerg pointed, recently ftracetest becomes not POSIX
compliant, and such kind of issues happened repeatedly.
To avoid those anymore, I decided to introduce a testcase
which runs checkbasisms on ftracetest and its testcases.
I think this can help us to find out whether it was
written in a way out of POSIX.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (2):
selftests/ftrace: Make a script checkbashisms clean
selftests/ftrace: Add checkbashisms meta-testcase
tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest | 1 +
.../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_ftrace.tc | 2 +-
.../selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/selftest/bashisms.tc
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists