lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:07:12 +0530
From:   Bharath Vedartham <>
To:     Jens Axboe <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Prefer unsigned int over unsigned

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:15:30AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/24/19 7:19 AM, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> > Replace unsigned with unsigned int to improve readability.
> Frivolous change, would make a lot more sense to get checkpatch
> to stop complaining about this.
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on
fixing warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the
kernel, it would be great.

I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem
specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists