linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Prefer unsigned int over unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvy1fKXEwZJwhD=aCbQ67HO+eK8T27KEfMrLu13ABvO1Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:50:51 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Prefer unsigned int over unsigned

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@...il.com> wrote:
> I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on
> fixing checkpatch.pl warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the
> kernel, it would be great.
>
> I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem
> specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change?

This is a very good start:
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2017-April/017765.html

Happy hacking and welcome! :-)

-- 
Thanks,
//richard