[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7bdecc2-5e64-a3a6-e62c-3feec00972f2@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:10:48 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove zone_lru_lock() function access ->lru_lock
directly
s/function/and/ on the subject?
On 2/22/19 6:43 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> We have common pattern to access lru_lock from a page pointer:
> zone_lru_lock(page_zone(page))
>
> Which is silly, because it unfolds to this:
> &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_zones[page_zonenum(page)]->zone_pgdat->lru_lock
> while we can simply do
> &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->lru_lock
Heh, well spotted.
>
> Remove zone_lru_lock() function, since it's only complicate things.
> Use 'page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock' pattern instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists