[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190225121106.oig7s6odqikcn4xw@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:11:07 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Wang <wonderfly@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 10/25] printk: redirect emit/store to new
ringbuffer
On Wed 2019-02-20 22:25:00, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2019-02-20, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >> vprintk_emit and vprintk_store are the main functions that all printk
> >> variants eventually go through. Change these to store the message in
> >> the new printk ring buffer that the printk kthread is reading.
> >
> > Please, are there any candidates or plans to reuse the new ring
> > buffer implementation?
>
> As you pointed out below, this patch already uses the ring buffer
> implementation for a totally different purpose: NMI safe dynamic memory
> allocation.
I have found an alternative solution. We could calculate the length
of the formatted string without any buffer:
va_list args_copy;
va_copy(args_copy, args);
len = vscprintf(NULL, fmt, args_copy);
va_end(args_copy);
This vsprintf() mode was implemented for exactly this purpose.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists