linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: imx: Refactor entire sccg pll clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:23:14 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc:     Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: imx: Refactor entire sccg pll clk

Quoting Abel Vesa (2019-02-23 02:58:14)
> On 19-02-22 09:46:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Abel Vesa (2019-02-22 09:07:32)
> > > Make the entire combination of plls to be one single clock. The parents used
> > > for bypasses are specified each as an index in the parents list.
> > > The determine_rate does a lookup throughout all the possible combinations
> > > for all the divs and returns the best possible 'setup' which in turn is used
> > > by set_rate later to set up all the divs and bypasses.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
> > > Tested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> > > Acked-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > I suspect these tested by and acked tags should have been dropped,
> > unless you discussed and tested off-list?
> > 
> 
> Oups, I forgot to drop them.

Ok. Can Lucas re-test?