[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <198b2412-e81d-6c55-c74f-c2cab60fc5f2@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:08:10 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu: Only write PKRU if it is different from
current
On 2/21/19 3:50 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static inline void __write_pkru(u32 pkru)
> {
> u32 ecx = 0, edx = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * WRPKRU is relatively expensive compared to RDPKRU.
> + * Avoid WRPKRU when it would not change the value.
> + */
> + if (pkru == __read_pkru())
> + return;
> /*
> * "wrpkru" instruction. Loads contents in EAX to PKRU,
> * requires that ecx = edx = 0.
Could we do this in write_pkru() instead? I tried to keep the __
versions of read and write as simple and symmetric as possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists