linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] Independent SOCFPGA SDRAM EDAC config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190225204244.GJ26145@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:42:44 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     dinguyen@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, mchehab@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] Independent SOCFPGA SDRAM EDAC config

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:56:44PM -0600, thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Most users want EDAC support so make it the default.
> 
> SOCFPGA SDRAM EDAC reporting was enabled by the parent EDAC
> config (CONFIG_ALTERA_EDAC) since initial customers always
> wanted SDRAM EDAC enabled.
> There are cases where the SDRAM needs to be disabled while
> the other block EDACs remain enabled.
> This patch set 1) splits out the SDRAM EDAC into a separate
> config and 2) enables all the EDAC blocks by default for
> 32 bit SOCFPGA.
> 
> V2 Changes
>   Rebase socfpga_defconfig against arm-soc/arm/defconfig
> 
> Thor Thayer (2):
>   EDAC, altera: Add separate SDRAM EDAC config
>   ARM: socfpga_defconfig: enable EDAC by default

Am I supposed to take the second patch too or is it going through Dinh's
tree?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.