[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226091308.ycruijz2lcziv5gt@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:13:08 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: digetx@...il.com, jhogan@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:55:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA
> driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case.
> In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for
> managing clocks and power explicitly, which is not really necessary
> when PM support on tegra is in good shape. In fact ARM 64-bit Tegra
> platforms enforce PM support and there is no reason why this cannot be
> done for 32-bit.
>
> More details with regards to above can be found in following patch,
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1036645/
>
> This patch selects PM unconditionally and drivers can rely on runtime
> PM framework for clock and power management.
What if the drivers are re-used on another SoC IP? Doesn't this lead
to unexpected failures?
If you want to do this, maybe also make those drivers depend on PM as
well?
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
> index 7f3b83e..51a8fa3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_TEGRA
> select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
> select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
> select PINCTRL
> + select PM
> select PM_OPP
> select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
> select RESET_CONTROLLER
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists