linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86293ce9-fb0d-3412-df9a-0ff380ab2eb6@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:46:45 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        jhogan@...nel.org
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

26.02.2019 11:25, Sameer Pujar пишет:
> The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA
> driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case.
> In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for
> managing clocks and power explicitly, which is not really necessary
> when PM support on tegra is in good shape. In fact ARM 64-bit Tegra
> platforms enforce PM support and there is no reason why this cannot be
> done for 32-bit.
> 
> More details with regards to above can be found in following patch,
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1036645/

I think you meant this: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/