linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] scsi: ufs: Do not disable vccq in UFSHC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7f37c2d-27c7-9b58-20c8-52624783a6fa@free.fr>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:45:58 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        Stanislav Nijnikov <stanislav.nijnikov@....com>,
        Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@....com>,
        Ohad Sharabi <ohad.sharabi@....com>,
        Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
        Gilad Broner <gbroner@...eaurora.org>,
        Raviv Shvili <rshvili@...eaurora.org>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Kyuho Choi <kyuho.choi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] scsi: ufs: Do not disable vccq in UFSHC driver

On 26/02/2019 15:44, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> Hi Marc,
> 
>> Commit 60f0187031c0 ("disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device")
>> introduced a small power optimization as a driver quirk: ignore the
>> vccq load specified in the UFSHC DT node when said host controller
>> is connected to specific Flash chips (Samsung and Hynix currently).
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Revert the original patch, and clean up loose ends in the next patch.
> 
> This commit isn't a revert. Why not?

What do you mean?