[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226205946.GA21115@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:59:46 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sbc60xxwdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:58:35AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c: In function ‘fop_ioctl’:
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c:272:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> wdt_keepalive();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c:275:2: note: here
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> ^~~~
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> index 87333a41f753..72d15fd1f183 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> @@ -270,8 +270,8 @@ static long fop_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>
> timeout = new_timeout;
> wdt_keepalive();
> - /* Fall through */
> }
> + /* Fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(timeout, p);
> default:
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists