[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226230729.bz2ukzlub3rbdoqp@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:07:29 -0500
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -V8] mm, swap: fix race between swapoff and some swap
operations
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:49:05PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Do you have time to take a look at this patch?
Hi Ying, is this handling all places where swapoff might cause a task to read
invalid data? For example, why don't other reads of swap_map (for example
swp_swapcount, page_swapcount, swap_entry_free) need to be synchronized like
this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists