[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imx6rq39.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:13:14 +0800
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -V8] mm, swap: fix race between swapoff and some swap operations
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:49:05PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Do you have time to take a look at this patch?
>
> Hi Ying, is this handling all places where swapoff might cause a task to read
> invalid data? For example, why don't other reads of swap_map (for example
> swp_swapcount, page_swapcount, swap_entry_free) need to be synchronized like
> this?
I have checked these places. They are safe because there are some locks
(like page lock, page table lock, etc.) held to prevent swapoff. I
found another place in the kernel that is unsafe: the mincore. I have a
patch for that and will post it (in fact again) after this one is
merged.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists