linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL for allocations in scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1h8cp9tw8.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:40:39 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL for allocations in scsi_scan.c


Benjamin,

> We had a test-report where, under memory pressure, adding LUNs to the
> systems would fail (the tests add LUNs strictly in sequence):

Applied to 5.1/scsi-queue, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering