linux-kernel - [tip:perf/core] perf report: Don't shadow inlined symbol with different addr range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-7346195e8643482968f547483e0d823ec1982fab@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 23:40:37 -0800
From:   tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     acme@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, milian.wolff@...b.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, hekuang@...wei.com, hpa@...or.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, namhyung@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf report: Don't shadow inlined symbol with
 different addr range

Commit-ID:  7346195e8643482968f547483e0d823ec1982fab
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/7346195e8643482968f547483e0d823ec1982fab
Author:     He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:05:31 +0800
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:30:12 -0300

perf report: Don't shadow inlined symbol with different addr range

We can't assume inlined symbols with the same name are equal, because
their address range may be different. This will cause the symbols with
different addresses be shadowed when adding to the hist entry, and lead
to ERANGE error when checking the symbol address during sample parse,
the addr should be within the range of [sym.start, sym.end].

The error message is like: "0x36aea60 [0x8]: failed to process type: 68".

The second parameter of symbol__new() is the length of the fake symbol
for the inline frame, which is the subtraction of the end and start
address of base_sym.

Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Fixes: aa441895f7b4 ("perf report: Compare symbol name for inlined frames when sorting")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190219130531.15692-1-hekuang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/sort.c    | 10 ++++++++--
 tools/perf/util/srcline.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index 2b6c1ccb878c..d2299e912e59 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -231,8 +231,14 @@ static int64_t _sort__sym_cmp(struct symbol *sym_l, struct symbol *sym_r)
 	if (sym_l == sym_r)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (sym_l->inlined || sym_r->inlined)
-		return strcmp(sym_l->name, sym_r->name);
+	if (sym_l->inlined || sym_r->inlined) {
+		int ret = strcmp(sym_l->name, sym_r->name);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		if ((sym_l->start <= sym_r->end) && (sym_l->end >= sym_r->start))
+			return 0;
+	}
 
 	if (sym_l->start != sym_r->start)
 		return (int64_t)(sym_r->start - sym_l->start);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
index 00f215580b5a..10ca1533937e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct symbol *new_inline_sym(struct dso *dso,
 	} else {
 		/* create a fake symbol for the inline frame */
 		inline_sym = symbol__new(base_sym ? base_sym->start : 0,
-					 base_sym ? base_sym->end : 0,
+					 base_sym ? (base_sym->end - base_sym->start) : 0,
 					 base_sym ? base_sym->binding : 0,
 					 base_sym ? base_sym->type : 0,
 					 funcname);