lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:53:42 +0000
From:   Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Alexandre TORGUE" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander
 (STMFX) core bindings

On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is 
identical to v3.

I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side 
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change 
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.

Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ